Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Cravings

http://emotionaldetective.com/?page_id=244

See the above on “Manipulating Choice” and “What Do We Really Choose?” by Cindy Meyer, Ph.D.  for clarification of how our desires are manipulated by pairing something that might be good for us (e.g., milk, if it is good for you) with something also good for us (in Dr. Meyers’ example a beautiful person, symbolizing the consumer’s wish to feel beautiful). SUGGESTIONS When you are dealing with with cravings, even if you give in and find yourself unsatisfied, look back over the moments before you gave in to your “choice”. Feel and wonder what emotions, and thoughts, beliefs, were milling around in you at the time. Wonder what you might really have needed then instead of plugging in the thing that you do impulsively, or self-indulgently, or simply by habit. Yawn gently, rolling your eyes upward under droopy eyelids to allow yourself the sensation of needing, wanting something good for you, and not having it…yet. Shake your head in confusion, wondering what the heck it is you really need and could/should be doing when you get these cravings. Roll your shoulders and neck in uncertainty. Then distract yourself from the challenge by doing something fun or interesting or some absorbing, gratifying routine that needs to get done. Let the problem subside into your unconscious mind, and intend that answers will come. In time.

Advertisement

My book, “Celebrate Your Emotions: A Guide to Eight Incredibly Transforming Feelings” is available now as e-book from my website, and will be available through Amazon in 2-3 months from end January 2011. Thank you for your interest.

PSYCHOLOGY: This book is an elegant description, with lavish case examples, of how and why psychotherapy works to unearth the innate goodness in human beings. And how trauma, even the normal trauma of loving upbringing, all too easily leads to masking of our humanity.  Alice Miller’s words are in quotes herein, and my own comments outside of the quotes or in brackets within quotes. She emphasizes the need for safe expression, witnessing, or feelings and thoughts. “To heal our wounds, we eventually need two “knowing witnesses”—the therapist and our body, whose language will warn us the moment we abandon our truth.” (p xi)  Miller focuses especially on why not everyone—in fact most people—do not become a mass murderers despite grave wounds. “Hitler never had a single other human being in whom he could confide his true feelings: he was not only mistreated but also prevented from experiencing and expressing his pain; he didn’t have any children [of his own]who could have served as objects [for siphoning off and socializing] his hatred; …his lack of education did not allow him to ward off his hatred by intellectualizing it. Had a single one of these factors been different, perhaps he would never have become the arch-criminal he did.” Miller is in no way excusing Hitler: only refusing to demonize him or any other criminal. (p xvi) She explains that the balancing act of child-rearing is in dealing humanely with “obstinacy, willfulness, defiance and the exuberant character of children’s emotions.” (p 10) “The conscious use of humiliation…destroys the child’s self-confidence” especially when delivered “Feigning friendliness” to the child…meaning only showing the positive intent of parenting, but not being thoroughly honest with our own defensiveness, fright, hate, rage, etc. (pp 21, 23) The “predictable submissiveness” which then develops is actually “the loss of (the child’s) capacity for spontaneous feeling.” (p24)  “Crying as a natural reaction to pain is suppressed…” (p25) with witting [or unwitting] rejection by the parents of the child’s experience.  I would point out that even kindness disempowers someone who needs more time to experience their loss, as in my young patient/client who was finally able to say to his cheery, upbeat mother ‘I’m not done being sad yet’ with the result that his mom learned to tolerate his sadness, and he was then able to digest his emotions, and not act out with violence in school. “The results of this struggle against strong emotions are so disastrous because the suppression begins in infancy, i.e., before the child’s self has had a chance to develop.” (p 27) “Once the child’s intelligence has been stultified by [active or unwitting suppression, he/she] can easily be manipulated.” (p34) so that “As an adult, … will often allow himself to be manipulated by various forms of propaganda since he is already used to having his “inclinations” manipulated and has never known anything else.” (p45) Indeed: as are we all, as adults, too easily manipulated because, out of touch with our true emotions, we are also out of touch with our intuition. Caught in the vice of unchallenged ideas swallowed whole, we are imprisoned against using our emotions wisely even if they reach they surface. “When terrorists…(harm innocents) … in the service of a grand and idealistic cause, are they really doing anything different from what was once done to them?” (p66)  TO COUNTER THE SUPPRESSION and inability of adults to direct themselves in healthy fulfilling ways psychotherapy steps in to encourage “…free expression of resentment against one’s parents…[and others]. It provides access to one’s true self, reactivates numbed feelings, opens the way for mourning and—with luck—reconciliation.” “Pain over the frustration one has suffered is …(not) harmful. It is a natural, human reaction.” (p259)  It is only the lack of understanding of that frustration that is toxic. “Hatred is a normal human feeling, and a feeling has never killed anyone.” “(p281) [See my website www.surfyoursoul.com , A New Glossary of Emotions and book “Celebrate Your Emotions” for more on the path from anger to wellness] Alice Miller appeals for the healing power of psychotherapy to be not just directed at victims, but also at offenders, who were once victims themselves… “Even the worst criminal of all time was not born a criminal.” and “Living out hatred is the opposite of experiencing it.” (p197)… and then at the seemingly well-functioning majority “… (to) we realize how many pent-up feelings and aggressions people who function well and who behave unobtrusively must live with and the toll this takes on their health…” She pleads “Psychotherapeutic treatment is not inexpensive … but is it less expensive to lock (someone) up for the rest of their life?” (p231) Or, I would add, to suffer the untold trillions of costs that untreated emotional stress takes on worldwide human health and potential? It’s easy to argue that side of the treatment question, but I too struggle with such expenditures in my own family, justifying, resisting, or not. But to continue with Alice Miller’s words, “Everyone must find his own form of aggressiveness in order to avoid letting himself be made into art obedient puppet manipulated by others.” (p265) At the same time, as the children’s film “Where the Wild Things Are” shows, finding the fair limits to anger expression is a challenge at the opposite end, as “Judith” tells Max “It’s your job to make me happy, so if I want to eat you, you have to say, ‘OK Judith, whatever makes you happy.” Yes, allowing anger versus training it is quite the challenge, and tragically being to extreme in either direction creates violence of thought or action.

 

NATURE/SPIRITUALITY  [Report] Franz de Waal, awesome researcher into bonobos and their great likenesses to humans (e.g. flatter faces, and over and above chimpanzees by far, bonobos, like humans, are more disposed to make love, not war) now has research to document also the goodness—morality—of other primates than bonobos. Chimps show compassion, remorse, and grief (e.g., a whole troop not eating for a day in response to the death of a troop member). Capuchin monkeys will choose to gain a treat that leads to their friend/neighbor monkey also being given a treat rather than just randomly, or even preferentially choosing any treat. De Waal says that nature is moral, that religion does not create morality, but that religion may be needed to help maintain and foster natural morality. Apparently, this annoys both atheists and religious fundamentalists alike. [opinion] I couldn’t agree more heartily with Dr. de Waal. I have long said that the Ten Commandments are reminders to do the right thing, and function as an antidote to human creativity. Too easily, we word-based, symbol-based humans can make up new rules: wrong rules, ugly rules, stupid rules. Does this mean that our fellow creatures are more moral than we? Hmmm. Good question. Religions everywhere, found in every culture, try to help people come back to the natural, balanced path. Our fellow creatures don’t need religion. Or do they? Honestly, I am always preaching some degree of ethics and manners to my horse, other horses, the barn cat, and various barn dogs. I do this preaching by way of using emotions [see my book “Celebrate Your Emotions” at my website http://www.ssurfyoursoul.com ], words (to help me focus), imagery (to better communicate the territory I am addressing) and of course sounds (growls, ssst’s, clicks, etc). Am I being a religious leader to my animal friends? And they to me? Hmmm.

 

Emotional injuries from a narcissistic parent may be the greatest “normal” wounds a child can suffer—especially for the first two children. In the wounds can be a special depth of despair and fury, for the first two children are as gifted at conscious empathy as their parents are not. Therefore, it is particularly agonizing to these children that their parent responds so cluelessly and even cruelly. (1) The pattern of self-expressive parents in general—not just narcissistic ones—is to insert critical, cutting, thoughtless, hurtful remarks into otherwise friendly, affectionate, engaging, even doting, conversation, utterly unaware that they have just “struck” their child. (2) What makes the narcissist’s “blows” especially toxic is that when the child tries to push back, there is no one surer on earth that they are right than a narcissist. Whereas a child might get through to other parents, or at least wobble them a bit, the fight is just too confusing and daunting with a narcissist. (3) Perhaps the most important key to setting narcissists straight is to recognize that they are in love with their ideas…not themselves. Narcissists often suffer extreme depression and covert low self-esteem because they alienate people with their behavior and not only don’t know why, but are likely to be aggressive and blaming in response to being rejected rather than feel simple pain at the loss or lack of response. (4) A second key is to confront them in a spirit of kindness and firm determination. If you back down, they will continue their love affair with their point of view. If you attack, they will counterattack immediately, because, of course, they’re right (but not really). If you can master this tricky mix, you can help school the most entrenched narcissist into the possibility that your ideas are just as important as theirs. (5) A third key is to feel free to say “shame on you” (and it helps to mentally or physically hunch shoulders to ears and duck face into hands, I think, to send a more congruent message since shame is such a tricky emotion http://www.surfyoursoul.com ). The narcissist is fired up by avoidance of shame—hence the “in love with being right” to avoid the shame of being wrong.

Dizzy happy circles

Today I was carried away by happiness. And then worried. When I get too happy, I can go hypomanic—meaning get stuck in the emotion of hypomania. Now hypomania is a perfectly respectable emotion (excitement, aggressiveness, optimism…I think) but getting stuck in it is bad for me. Especially when I can’t stay asleep at night because of it. And worse, today, when I couldn’t even focus because I was so giddy with my successes and connections. Wondering how the heck to settle down, I went to the car to get some full bags I had left there (reusable ones with handles of course). On my way back into the house, after making sure no one was looking, I began spinning, bags balanced in each hand, for added centripetal force. Just felt like it, no prior experience with this spinning thing…at least, not as an adult. Except to know that it’s really important to physically express overwhelming emotion in order to move through it and allow its complex information to filter through. I changed directions often. Until the last spin when I almost fell over, so I quit. Joila!!! Hypomania resolved. Simple peace restored. I am focused enough to write this blog. 🙂

Narcissism is an over-used word for “self-centered” in both the clinical world and the world at large. There are actually three other clinical ways to be self-centered: histrionically, borderline, and paranoid. And out in the general world, one can be self-centered in healthy ways: centered on one’s own perspective and emotions as first-line sources of information, and then attentive to others’ perspectives and feelings. Also, one can be other-centered yet adhere to such a rigid set of values that they are essentially self-centered after all, unable to truly take in another’s point of view. But returning to narcissism, the key is that narcissism as a normal personality core seems to simply mean being in absorbed in one’s own ideas. There’s a magical enchantment in such absorption, leading as it does to outside-the-box, daringly original thinking such as is highly valued in American culture. Narcissism only turns ugly through lack of understanding of how to foster the assets of the narcissist while helping him/her skirt the ‘dark side’ of their gifts. People tend to be overly admiring of narcissistic style at first, and later overly censuring when they have ‘spoiled’ their narcissistic friend/child/mate with overindulgence and then have a runaway freight train on their hands. www.surfyoursoul.com

In the Passover service, there is reference to “four children” who ask four different kinds of questions that every parent must deal with. These are played out as separate children in the service, but are more likely referencing states of questioning through which every child (and adult) alternates. These four children are 1) the wise child; 2) the rebellious child; 3) the simple child; 4) the child who does not know how to ask. Somehow these ideas of parent and four children made me think of the world’s great religions: Hinduism; Judaism; Buddhism; Christianity; Islam. The Hindu faith is the oldest, therefore the parent. In its acceptance of all beliefs, and in its enormous pantheon of deities representing many aspects of the world, it seems to embody humanity’s love of the world. After the Hindu faith, the first of the remaining Big Four seems to have been Judaism, the wise child. Wise, perhaps, because of its emphasis on oneness of the divine, and humanity’s responsibility to love that ineffable, incomprehensible oneness with all our hearts, souls and might. The Buddhist faith, perhaps the rebellious child despite its quiescence, rejects the world and instead embraces the world deep within the self: love of self. Christianity, the simple child, simply emphasizes God’s love for the world and God’s role as parent to humanity “for God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten son”. And Islam, the child who does not know how to ask, does not concern itself with God versus the world or self, but rather humanity’s responsibility to humanity: brotherly love. Each of these faiths of course has all the aspects of each of the others in it. Love is indeed all there is, yet its direction of flow can vary. The emphasis seems important in that each of us must find the windows on love and God through which we see the most clearly.  www.surfyoursoul.com

I am fond of saying that the last “-ism” yet to fall (after, say racism and agism) will be “species-ism”: the prejudiced assumption of lesser intelligence, value, and identity of our fellow creatures. “The Tao of Equus” discusses of kinder, wiser approaches to horses, but also cautionary tales of how even best intentions go awry with human presumption and ignorance. “Completely inexperienced  riders will spend several hundred dollars to attend a two-day workshop with a famous equestrian…. Yet when these people try to follow the methods demonstrated at the clinic, they haven’t developed the coordination, balance, understanding or equine conformation and body language, intuition, or level of sociosensual awareness needed to put these techniques effectively to use…. If I wanted to run a nonprofit horse-rescue mission, I could make an entire career out of taking horses off the hands of disillusioned owners too stubborn [or ignorant, or arrogant] to get help….”  [brackets mine]  www.surfyoursoul.com

In the Passover service, there is reference to “four children” who ask four different kinds of questions that every parent must deal with. These are played out as separate children in the service, but are more likely referencing states of questioning through which every child (and adult) alternates. These four children are 1) the wise child; 2) the rebellious child; 3) the simple child; 4) the child who does not know how to ask. Somehow these ideas of parent and four children made me think of the world’s great religions: Hinduism; Judaism; Buddhism; Christianity; Islam. The Hindu faith is the oldest, therefore the parent. In its acceptance of all beliefs, and in its enormous pantheon of deities representing many aspects of the world, it seems to embody humanity’s love of the world. After the Hindu faith, the first of the remaining Big Four seems to have been Judaism, the wise child. Wise, perhaps, because of its emphasis on oneness of the divine, and humanity’s responsibility to love that ineffable, incomprehensible oneness with all our hearts, souls and might. The Buddhist faith, perhaps the rebellious child despite its quiescence, rejects the world and instead embraces the world deep within the self: love of self. Christianity, the simple child, simply emphasizes God’s love for the world and God’s role as parent to humanity “for God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten son”. And Islam, the child who does not know how to ask, Does not concern itself with God versus the world or self, but rather humanity’s responsibility to humanity: brotherly love. Each of these faiths of course has all the aspects of each of the others in it. Love is indeed all there is, yet its direction of flow can vary. The emphasis seems important in that each of us must find the windows on love and God through which we see the most clearly.